Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Philip Morris - A Stock For Wealth Or Poverty (MO) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Theo Karantsalis who wrote (4010)	6/22/1999 11:48:00 AM
From: md1derful	Respond to of 6439

It didn't for Johnnie Cochran!!! The jury was "nullified" and bought every word of his...I'm wondering if Stanley is going for jury nullification too.

To: Theo Karantsalis who wrote (4010)	6/22/1999 1:51:00 PM
From: Ian@SI	Respond to of 6439

Theo, I'm not a lawyer, but I suspect that the industries lawyers have a very solid basis in law to ask for a mistrial. The fact that the judge didn't summarily dismiss the motion would imply that there is some legal basis with merit for seeking the Mistrial. We could see some very good news sooner than expected. Ian.

To: Theo Karantsalis who wrote (4010)	6/22/1999 4:05:00 PM
From: Ralph Bergmann	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6439

Theo, at the end it counts how the Homer's et al. are deciding, whatever legal basis the case has, it is meaning less as long as non-professionals are in the jury. However, I hope the best for us. Ralph