Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (53947)	6/22/1999 2:04:00 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

Very good points all in all. <<...imply that with enough money a father is not necessary.>> Wow, I didn't get that but I can certainly see how someone could use the study to make that point. Some of my friends are very generous. They will open their home, kill the fatted calf (or kitty, which ever is handy), and insist on serving me like a king. Once I am there I am like a royal prisoner. They wont let me go home for days and they wont accept anything in return. If, however, the same friends loan me ten dollars, it is an issue between us until it is paid. I feel like I have a tattoo on my forehead saying ten bucks, every time I see them. I can not explain why cash measures have such an effect on people but I figured that was why that article focused on economic impact of absent fathers. I'm sure the group doing the study was also aware of other factors.