SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : TLAB info? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Baldwin who wrote (5739)6/22/1999 7:08:00 PM
From: still learning  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 7342
 
Baldwin, $33 was NOT a pre-split price. In June of last year, the Cienna fiasco had not taken shape. TLAB was at $66, but if you own 200 shares now, you only owned 100 shares (or $6,600 worth)then. Today you have 200 shares at $70 (or $14,000 worth).

I simply changed the way I phrased it to translate for you. It was $33 in TODAY's currency a year ago (which would have meant $66 per pre-split share a year ago -- but you would have owned half as many shares. I should know since I've had it in my account the whole time. I simply RE-phrased the pricing since it looked like you were having trouble seeing that both TLAB and CSCO have doubled (taking into account any and all splits) in one year's time.

If you just go to any chart of the stock you'll see it shows splits with a little triangle. They also adjust the price on those charts to account for any splits. So if the 1yr chart says it was trading at 33 (that was really 66 since it split 2 for 1 in the interim)

CSCO has split twice in that time, once 3for2 AND now 2for1. Either way it's clear they've tracked each other's performance over a yr.



To: Baldwin who wrote (5739)6/24/1999 12:08:00 AM
From: Farfel  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 7342
 
Still learning: TLABs was 15 11/16 on 10/08/1998---split adjusted. Now Tlabs stands at 69 5/8 that means that Tlabs has increased 343.83% since its low on October 8 of last year. That is a great move for a stock supposedly technologically inferior as some I have seen others attempt to lambast TLABs on other boards.