Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : IDT *(idtc) following this new issue?* -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Augustus Gloop who wrote (9821)	6/23/1999 3:44:00 PM
From: Andrew H	Respond to of 30916

My understanding is that it is clearly illegal to give out investment advice without a license. The question is what exactly constitutes giving investment advice? I think the wording is important. If as steve host said, Mr. Pink actually issued a recommendation, then he could have a problem. Even his followers agree he is publicly issuing recommendations. But that is for SEC professionals to decide. Generally they will look into such things if they get enough complaints. After all who wants to deny realty? Message 10228954 >>it is clear to all that he has re-issued a short rec and to deny that is to deny reality.<<

To: Augustus Gloop who wrote (9821)	6/23/1999 3:46:00 PM
From: Peter Yang	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 30916

I don't think we need to do more to convince those Pinkies that IDTC is not the one to short. We have given all the facts and it's their money to bet. Actually the more they short the merrier. When IDTC starts to move, all the shorts are going to contribute to the explosive upward movement. In addition, I don't think the drops for IDTC in the last a few days have anything to do with Pinky (Though, he would love to have you believe so). It's the sector (check QWST, PGEX, etc.)! It's the market in general!