SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: RTev who wrote (24756)6/23/1999 4:42:00 PM
From: Jill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74651
 
Whoa! What an "epiphany" as you say. But they knew that already on the Laughter thread--as you recall and I posted yesterday, it was Billy boy who defied God and got the user to use Windows...not even Jackson can bring us back to the Garden...we have ate of the tree of knowledge of bits and bytes...

Jill



To: RTev who wrote (24756)6/24/1999 7:55:00 AM
From: John Soileau  Respond to of 74651
 
RTev's post:

<<In any case, MSFT lawyers have done a good job in the rebuttal phase, IMHO.
Too bad Lacovara was not running the show in the first phase.

I agree on both points. Lacovara (whose name I misspelled the other day), especially,
seems to have come into his own in this phase of the trial. ] He clearly did a good job of preparing
Schmalensee for testimony this time. >>

Press Report:

<<Schmalensee had also testified that Microsoft's Windows program was potentially under siege from a host of new programs that could run on the Web, no matter what the underlying operating system. But he acknowledged under cross-examination that he had done no study, had no
projections of numbers and no knowledge about the authors or details of the programs he cited in his testimony.>>

This was NOT a minor point he offered testimony on (potential viability of competitive products), yet the man himself said he had done no prior study!? Astonishing. And quite the opposite of "well prepared".