To: lttb who wrote (19771 ) 6/25/1999 2:59:00 AM From: TOM Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 34075
1ttb: The conference call was positive in some respects, it afforded some answers. To my way of thinking, the news release & conference call raised these questions: Ronald Atwood, Phd. former chief metallugist for Newmont Mining called the cangalli deposit "enormous". To my understanding of such adjectives, 'enormous' is more than 'huge' or 'large'. More akin to "godzillian". He seemed quite positive in his statements. However, the questions arise: How "viable" is this find? Meaning, will it be economic since the statement was also made somewhere that the mining of it may be difficult. However, from the news release & the conference, my impression is there is a lot more exploration to find things out, and there may very well be rich undiscovered pockets or areas not hit upon yet. I'm positive on this respect & think there must still be a lot of preliminary exploration to be done yet. The one point that I do not understand, that the geologists should answer: There was in the Behre Dolbear report the statement made that the "alluvial" gold was deposited throughout the enire 1600 feet thickness, rather than at or near the bedrock gravel contact as in typical alluvial gold deposits. The "unique nature" of the conglomerate gold deposits. Hmm. Well, I'm not by any means an expert, but an amateur, however do some amateur prospecting. So we have this unique, enormous 'alluvial' deposit. "Alluvial" means basically carried by water, in mining was borrowed from alluvial, wave or current carried, but water carried. NOT the mother lode or source. Just kinda a laundry drainage wash of the real thing. Carrying some particulate matter with it, in this case gold. So, sylogically, here we have this 'enormous' alluvial deposit some 1600 feet thick, unique. But where's the mention of the possible source or reason whereof this deposit is there? If this washdown alluvial deposit is so great, what about the source rock or mother lode? Or at least an answer here. Perhaps it could be eons of washing downhill, but the pro geologists don't even venture us a theory? I know prospectors who find alluvial wash or "float" look upstream for source. Being said to be 'alluvial', it is not an igneous deposit... Maybe its the "Pikes Peak" of Gold source. My point is that the information afforded could be more informative instead of raising questions. Also, the huge amount of shares floated is a big dilution. I wish Golden Eagle well as I hold a chunk of shares, but I'm not very optimistic given the too many "iffys": viability, price of gold, how feasible the mining, paucity of information given, large float of shares out. All said, best wishes & hopes for sucess! Tom