SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Charles R who wrote (63079)6/24/1999 12:24:00 AM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1572946
 
Charles R

RE: "No K6-3 mentioned"

That is not what i got from the cc. He was asked by one analyst/principal form oppenheimer what would be the allocation of K7 production in the sub $1000 pc market vs above $1000. Sanders response was that no k7's this year will be found in any pc costing less than $1200; the K6 would be used in the sub $1200 market. Now I do not remember if he said K6-3 or simply K6. Is this different from what you understood?

ted



To: Charles R who wrote (63079)6/24/1999 12:52:00 AM
From: kash johal  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1572946
 
Chuck,

Re: K6-3

I guess the positioning is pretty clear.

Fast K6-2's for desktop sub 1K market - Mhz sells marketplace.

K6-3's for laptops - should be an excellent laptop chip once in 0.18 micron.

K7's for higher end desktops and workstations.

Also the statement that 0.18 micron had started production was very positive IMHO.

Regards,

Kash


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News