Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: survivin who wrote (63120)	6/24/1999 8:04:00 AM
From: Synapsid	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1571292

Looking at AMD's failure from another direction, does the choice of cache architecture have anything to do with it? With mainstream low-end processors moving towards $50, the extra cost of the archaic cache memory on K6-2 motherboards may have impacted PC OEM's design decisions as well as the motherboard channel out of Asia (excerbated by cheap Celeron motherboards using low-cost chipsets). The 256Kb cache on the K6-3 appears to be too fat to be able to position the chip in the low end. If AMD had designed a K6 with a lean 128Kb cache, wouldn't they have fared much better? Now, the K7 appears to have a 128Kb L1 cache, but apparently, AMD does not have the manufacturing flexibility and motherboard design infrastructure to ramp it for low-end systems in a reasonable time-frame.