SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Philip Morris - A Stock For Wealth Or Poverty (MO) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: dper who wrote (4030)6/24/1999 8:55:00 AM
From: md1derful  Respond to of 6439
 
Again some play in the local newspapers..about Heim's rebuttal...somewhat positive...as millions of people have quit smoking, I think one is most correct when he says the nature of the "addiction" is not clear...I would go so far to say that the product does not satisfy the criteria as say drug addiction, which is my understanding of the nature of the beast...but I agree, to say the tob is not addicting is about as half a truth as to say that it,in fact,is....



To: dper who wrote (4030)6/24/1999 9:17:00 AM
From: Theo Karantsalis  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 6439
 
Hello dper,

It may be implied that nicotine is addictive; however, has it been proven scientifically? Mr. Heim is properly defending his clients when he reminds the jurors "to reject the contention that nicotine is an addictive drug like heroin or cocaine."

Each word is extremely important. It is only proper to disassociate tobacco from dangerous drugs like heroin and cocaine.

"But if I am a jurist, I'd be insulted..."

Unfortunately, we're not jurors in this most important case. People with superior intellectual ability rarely find themselves on a jury.

I don't believe that you would be insulted if you were in the courtroom listening to Mr. Rosenblatt's references to the Holocaust, Rosa Parks, etc., and then listening to Mr. Heim rebuke these claims in a professional, responsible, and intelligent manner. Please understand that you probably think more like a rational scientist. Civil procedure is oftentimes irrational.

Respectfully,

Theo