Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Kosovo -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neocon who wrote (12776)	6/24/1999 11:08:00 AM
From: MNI	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 17770

You are quite right that finding exotic looks useful for self- marketing means that the hold of stereotypes is weakening. It is not exactly what I wanted to say. What you said is only one side of a two-sided medal. On one hand the presence of e.g. exotic looking people stimulates interest that may break stereotypes and taboos. On the other hand stereotypes may be reinforced, reassured by the very same piece of media publication. In this respect we shouldn't forget that the TV consumer wishes to be comforted (as you said in a more unsuspective situtaion). It has a big effect on the presentation, normally an "open ending" will not take place, but the consumer will be comforted by new stereotypes in the best case, by reinstating some truth, at least, to the old stereotypes in most cases. In the end ambivalence about the media's role prevails, but one thing is clear: there would be no chance of publicly breaking stereotypes without appearance in the media. In choosing looks as an example I wanted to show again how wrong some people are who accused European TV of only showing white cliche types. TV couldn't even afford this course. MNI.

To: Neocon who wrote (12776)	6/24/1999 2:02:00 PM
From: MNI	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 17770

Your knowledge of the German scene is basically right. The estimation of the English fluency depends on too many factors. Another way of envisioning this question is noting that ALL German pupils are taught English for at least five years before leaving school. (Exceptions to this rule are below one per cent now). But as we also have analphabetics leaving school despite the school plans, we shouldn't assume that the proficiency of English reflects this schooling efforts. The way that the GDR handled NAZI history may be one example of the big gap of the politicians' actions and the thoughts of the population. The GDR had professional writers, actors, musicians etc. directly paid by the state and adressed in political speeches as "die Kulturschaffenden" (creators of culture). They were bound to "socialistic realism" and had to work on politically "relevant" topics. Surely NAZIs were somehow dealt with in literature and films. But on the other hand this remained shadowy, irrelevant for a big part of the population, very much like you stated. You seem to be too optimistic on the Western German progress in NAZI crime understanding. Yes, it is true, many things have been said and done, and surely there is some effect. And incrimination of NAZI symbols and the public stating of certain (neo)-NAZI ideology keypoints also has had a strong effect. I think in Western Germany there is nobody who has never been touched by a need of self-reflection about the question of personal and collective guilt. On the other hand, it is still not very widely accepted, that in post WWII-Germany also some cover up happened. After all, many NAZI criminals, even high ranking, have gained very responsible positions in post war Western Germany. The most prominent example may be Dr. Globke, top aidee ("grey eminence") of Chancellor Adenauer, who had signed responsible for the Comment on the Nuremberg Racial Laws. But he is not a singular case, rather he is typical of responsible positions both in state and industry management. Those people of course were networked in their own way making intrusion difficult, control impossible. And it opened them a way to seize a hidden control of processes shaping the new republic. Quite sure all that was known to you. It hurts me somehow that history was just a story retold after the end of the GDR. Of course some top politicians were brought to court. But those who are as well responsible for the working of that unlawful and sometimes bloody state, by taking care of their neighbor-spying work, as unlawful judges in court, and so on, are basically not accessible to be held responsible. Nor do they feel they would deserve it. Regards, MNI.