Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : IDT *(idtc) following this new issue?* -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: musicguy who wrote (9895)	6/24/1999 11:52:00 AM
From: blankmind	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 30916

if pinks id was common knowledge, the hitt's suit would have mentioned it unless they were protecting mr pinks id.

To: musicguy who wrote (9895)	6/24/1999 11:55:00 AM
From: HairBall	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 30916

musciguy: I did not say "he" gave it out himself. But "he" has had his share of run ins...and others have been suspended (I suspect) for posting who he is and where he works. I know I have seen the name and company posted before on his thread, but I have no personal knowledge the postings were correct. SI is very protective of personal information posted publicly by one member about another member. However, when SI is subpoenaed for personal information they have a double standard. They will give out your personal information on file and in what I "assume" is in most cases, make no required effort to inform the member. Per SI's Legal Department...... SI responds to dozens of subpoenas each week......SI makes an effort to inform its members when identifying information about them is requested in a subpoena. Due to time constraints, however, SI does not always have the time to inform its members of such subpoenas. For example, many times a subpoena will be received by SI from the government or a private party which has a very limited response time. Regards, LG