SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: The Philosopher who wrote (41722)6/24/1999 12:30:00 PM
From: epicure  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 108807
 
That is an extremely difficult problem- I have both gifted children and a special needs child. I will tell you that from a pure efficiency point of view- it initially appears that it makes more sense to spend the money on the brightest kids first and whatever is left over on the other kids (assuming you really CAN identify the "brightest" kids- not merely the most "gifted" but the brightest in terms of actual potential to benefit society). However, from another perspective it is probably EXTREMELY important to educate the special needs children- because so many people in prison have learning problems of one sort or another- learning problems that might not have been diagnosed and treated. IF those problems had been caught and they had been fitted to be able to obtain meaningful jobs- society would be benefiting from their labor instead of spending a fortune to incarcerate them and paying an untold human and peripheral economic tole (i.e. loss of security for the general population, property damage, higher insurance rates, more police etc etc etc) as a result of thier crimes

So if really pressed I think we need to try for a baseline for everyone- even the special needs students who will suck up more funds to achieve this baseline. And from what I have seen most really bright kids can self educate to some extent. I know this is not a perfect solution- but there are no perfect solutions (imo) when one is dealing with limited funds.



To: The Philosopher who wrote (41722)6/24/1999 7:21:00 PM
From: Dayuhan  Respond to of 108807
 
the public schools are required to accept those students and educate them, however much extra it costs.

It's a question of principle. It isn't very practical. Adherence to a principle often isn't.