SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : AUTOHOME, Inc -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ron Dior who wrote (11742)6/24/1999 1:57:00 PM
From: Stephen L  Respond to of 29970
 
Buckle-up because we may have a little turbulence ahead. One market commentary posits "Even though Greenspan suggested that the Fed will tighten on June 30, the market fared well because the CPI report indicated that the Fed's move is indeed preemptive."

In the immortal words of an old highschool chum "Yuh Right". The real question is whether or not the capital markets have already incorporated the expected rate move into their valuations. The ten year Treasury has advanced from a low of 4.17% last October to more than 6.05% by noon today. Despite a minor correction in the equities market price to earnings rations remain at extremely high levels: the Dow at 26x, the S&P500 at 33x and NASDAQ at 109x. I know earnings are supposed to rock & roll next year: eps if Asia and Latin America continue to blossom, but wait...doesn't the slower growth that Greenspan so dearly wants imply that someone's earnings will slow? We know it won't be any of the DOT.COMs because most don't have earnings. But who will loose in this scenario. OK we know it won't be our brokers.



To: Ron Dior who wrote (11742)6/24/1999 2:33:00 PM
From: red_dog  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 29970
 
Ron has a very good point, as I sit and go through some of the other threads in SI and other sights. I notice that people here some news on a stock and the first question they ask is WHAT'S THE SYMBOL now we know what they want. To go right to the broker and trade. I would say if they were going to research the stock they would only need the name. This is just my opinion.