Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (63188)	6/24/1999 3:00:00 PM
From: kash johal	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1572965

Tejek, Re:" Yes you are right on all points but intc is not impervious....they do have shareholders and a board of directors. Which do you think an intc shareholder would prefer: a prosperous AMD and not as but still prosperous intc or two companies that are both struggling financially? And also remember intc has more to lose....it will do this price war only so long as their bottom line is hurt marginally; anything more and forget it. In spite of rumors to the contrary, intc does screw up and is vulnerable." My investment thesis is that they will both do well once sanity prevails. Obviously once the personal nature of the battle softens (andy and jerry retire) they can live quite well with great returns for both companies. I happen to think AMD has more upside right now, although I will buy some Intel later this year, well before willy and merced hype shows up. Hopefully I can pick up intel well below $50. And yes everybody screw up even Intel, but I would not base an investment on assuming they will do so on a continual basis. Regards, Kash.