SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Micron Only Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Thomas G. Busillo who wrote (46733)6/24/1999 3:47:00 PM
From: John Graybill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 53903
 
Scary call from Niles, coming as it does during market hours, using the S-word and all. Yow.



To: Thomas G. Busillo who wrote (46733)6/24/1999 4:26:00 PM
From: Skeeter Bug  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 53903
 
guess mona was wrong about disaster being factored into the eps release... ;-) hi, mona! hope you bought lots of stock! ;-)



To: Thomas G. Busillo who wrote (46733)6/24/1999 4:38:00 PM
From: John Graybill  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 53903
 
Tom, what service gave you the Robbers & Stealers story? The earliest post I can find on the net is at prnewswire.com at 3:20 pm. I got an email alert from newsalert.com about 3:40 or so myself.

Based on the late-day Niles-inspired swoon, the last minute of MU trading looks like shorts getting their souls squeezed out of them. "They" jumped it from a solid 39 to 39 1/4 from one trade to the next and went from there. The 39 5/8 close is almost pure invention, a single trade of 2800 shares.



To: Thomas G. Busillo who wrote (46733)6/24/1999 5:46:00 PM
From: Bill F.  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 53903
 
mona and joey what a pair!just goes to show that the facts need not get in ones way(BG).



To: Thomas G. Busillo who wrote (46733)6/24/1999 5:48:00 PM
From: Knighty Tin  Respond to of 53903
 
Tom, C'mon, big fella. MU has only not paid the dividend for three years now. You can't really expect Niles to catch on that quickly, can you? <g> If somebody expects to lower an estimate after a conference call, shouldn't he in fact lower it as soon as he has that expectation?