Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : LAST MILE TECHNOLOGIES - Let's Discuss Them Here -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Doughboy who wrote (4326)	6/24/1999 5:15:00 PM
From: Frank A. Coluccio	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 12823

Doug, Mike.. I only have a moment, but didn't want the discussion to go too far on the merits of something that has been misconstrued. As far as I know, this is only a passive hand-off arrangement for now. The Optical Cross Connects which I referenced earlier in this scenario, was not of the type characterized by active devices using optoelectronics. Rather, I meant a fiber optic patch arrangement, or patch field, also referred variously as a fiberoptic- or optical- cross connect. I'll continue replying later on to the other issues. Perhaps the OCC that many were reminded of here was of the type supported by TLABs, LU, etc. in their digital cross connects, using OC-n interfaces. Not at all. Not yet, in any event. Later. Regards, Frank Coluccio