Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sir Francis Drake who wrote (24872)	6/24/1999 6:35:00 PM
From: t2	Respond to of 74651

Morgan, You made some good points. But---Just wait until JFD and especially the Blankone read your post. <g> I can't wait for their responses to you. You can just forget about the trial as the political posts are just beginning. I am laughing already.

To: Sir Francis Drake who wrote (24872)	6/24/1999 7:20:00 PM
From: Jill	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 74651

Morgan, I agree with you quite a lot--but Tech's right, the bullets are gonna fly on this thread now! Glad you said it, but expect a clintonista explosion from blankmind... I kind of agree with you about Clinton when one looks at it from the outside (how stupid!)...but probably whatever combination of qualities both admirable and flawed that drove him all the way to the presidency drove him to "rash" action, especially with all the pressure and power of that office. It sure doesn't look rational from the outside, but who knows what's inside. And then the way the Republicans drove it, to excess even when the public refused to respond all year, that wasn't rational either. Neither is Jacskon or the DOJ. But hey, what drives most of human endeavor ain't rational... I'd rather vote for a person than a party, myself. Because the parties are always changing anyway, and besides, they're not unified. Jill