Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : ADVV (Advantage Technologies) - formerly CSIN -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Michael Graham who wrote (315)	6/24/1999 9:36:00 PM
From: SgtPepper	Respond to of 483

NASDAQ is getting tough with enforcing the rules. A bad omen for many penny stock investors. This story is particularly poignant because the shareholders and company officials felt they were a special case. NOT! ___ HENDERSON, Nev., Jun 24, 1999 (BUSINESS WIRE via COMTEX) -- Alta Gold Co. to Appeal Alta Gold Co. Thursday announced that the Nasdaq Listing Qualifications Panel has denied the company's request for an extension of time to comply with Nasdaq's continued listing criteria, and accordingly has delisted the company's securities from the Nasdaq National Market as of the close of business Wednesday. Robert N. Pratt, president and chief executive officer of Alta Gold, stated: "We are extremely disappointed with Nasdaq. In spite of the in-person appeal we made in Washington, D.C., on behalf of our stockholders, and in spite of over 1,000 letters from our stockholders requesting that Nasdaq not delist the company, it is very disturbing that Nasdaq has chosen to ignore the interests of our stockholders. We intend to appeal this decision to the Nasdaq Listing and Hearing Review Council."

To: Michael Graham who wrote (315)	6/25/1999 1:11:00 AM
From: THOMAS GOODRICH	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 483

Michael, Thanks for the clarification. I'm not an investment professional or a Wall Street guru, so I am not honed up on exchange rules. As to your comment below, I highly doubt there is anything I could say that could/would lead investors into a false sense of security. They're doing a very good job of that on their own!<g> >>I just want to make it clear that CSIN will not be immune from delisting for the reason you mentioned. Your statement could mislead investors into a false sense of security.<< TG