SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : The New Iomega '2000' Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Rocky Reid who wrote (1074)6/25/1999 10:35:00 AM
From: Cogito  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 5023
 
Rooky -

Thanks for the lesson on basic finance, but Iomega's problem is not an excess of inventory offsetting obscenely high profits. Just look at their inventory turns from the last few quarters.

If the company makes a net profit on any product, that's a plus. If a buyer of a CD-RW gets it from Iomega instead of a competitor, that's a plus. That buyer was unlikely to have bought a Zip or Jaz anyway. (The majority of such people probably already own Zip and or Jaz drives.)

Look at it this way. If the company is losing money with the current product mix, how is it going to hurt them to add a new product to the mix, if that product is profitable?

Right now they make money on Zip, and they lose money on Jaz. Clik! barely figures into the equation yet. In the next couple of quarters, if the only thing that changes is that they make money on Zip and ZipCD, then ZipCD is a good thing.

- Allen



To: Rocky Reid who wrote (1074)6/26/1999 10:24:00 AM
From: BubbaFred  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 5023
 
Zip CD will be a big disappointment. It will be scratched in a year. Too much competition out there, and neither the Zip nor Iomega name has any association whatsoever with CD-RW . Compared to product reliability and customer service of HP, the Zip CD is a throw away toy. This is merely another joke by IOM.