Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Manhattan Minerals (MAN.T) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Claude Cormier who wrote (2548)	6/25/1999 1:15:00 AM
From: Not_Active	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4504

Hi Claude ... you're up late there in the Eastern time zone.

To: Claude Cormier who wrote (2548)	6/25/1999 1:31:00 AM
From: Elizabeth Andrews	Respond to of 4504

Claude, for heavens sake. The guarantee has nothing to do with raising money. Granted, it's one of the conditions just like having a trainer 10,000 ton per day mine. Manhattan has to guarantee that there will be no harm to the community or to the people or to the livestock or to the farms or to the water or to the church. What company can do this and what collateral do they have to post. Sort of reminds me of when Freeport drilled the condemnation holes at Bre-X. They said there was nothing there and the stock (Bre-X) still traded at C$3.50. If they were wrong then they've bet Grasberg, no? Yes! What happened to Boliden in Spain? What happened to Placer in the Philippines? Do you think any mining company is going to GUARANTEE no harm? What does this mean? How much do they have to bet? Please think about this tonight.