SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Gary Ng who wrote (63309)6/25/1999 2:12:00 AM
From: FJB  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1571973
 
Gary,

BTW, to hold Moore's Law, shouldn't we see 800Mhz parts from Intel by year end as there was(?) 400Mhz parts back in 2Q98?

I have read the same press, postings, etc. as you and I think Intel is still going to ship 800MHz chips this year and AMD may, with luck, do the same. Why isn't this possible?

Bob



To: Gary Ng who wrote (63309)6/25/1999 12:37:00 PM
From: Process Boy  Respond to of 1571973
 
Gary - <I thought it slipped twice. I remembered it was initially
set around the June time frame(?) but pushed back citing RDRAM
availability as the cause ? >

I believe the Camino delay and the Coppermine delay independent of each other.

<BTW, to hold Moore's Law, shouldn't we
see 800Mhz parts from Intel by year end as there was(?) 400Mhz
parts back in 2Q98 ?>

I believe it will be close.

PB






To: Gary Ng who wrote (63309)6/25/1999 9:30:00 PM
From: fyo  Respond to of 1571973
 
Gary - Re: Intel better do it. BTW, to hold Moore's Law, shouldn't we see 800Mhz parts from Intel by year end as there was(?) 400Mhz parts back in 2Q98 ? [sic]

Moore's Law was more a statement of the industry as a whole. Clearly, some parts of the industry are more in line with this than others. There are all sorts of hiccups and what not. A good example of a hiccup is, IMHO, Coppermine. I would still argue that Moore's Law is pretty much on target (even if CuMine doesn't hit 800MHz until Q2).

OT: When Moore formulated his postulate, he used the term 'processing power' of transistors. Interestingly enough, although we today consider Moore's Law to be a doubling every 18 months, his original formulation was 'no worse than a factor-of-two improvements every two years over the next 30 years'. FYI, that was in the mid-sixties.

--fyodor