Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : FRANKLIN TELECOM (FCM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Noneyet who wrote (951)	6/26/1999 12:06:00 AM
From: Salt'n'Peppa	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2891

I think the word you were looking for is "trivial", not "trivia"!!! See how a simple mistake on your part can change the entire meaning of your post!!! (that was a typo, right?) Franklin did the same thing you did (as the entire planet is well aware - yourself included), in the questioned news releases. I am sure that they are not at all confused as to what their companies consist of (and I am sure you know this too). <<< After and despite, the fact you were proven wrong. >>> Aside from the terrible grammer in the above sentence, I do understand your meaning, but I fail to understand what I was proven wrong about. <<< It safe to assume from the correction, franklin did not agree WITH YOU. >>> Agree with me about what? <<< Most companies know this instinctively... >>> I was not aware that companies had instincts! Again, see how simple grammatical errors can change the meaning of a statement. I understand from your last paragraph that you are labelling me a Franklin "bull" poster. Can you point to my last bullish post? I was very gentle in responding to your post here, seeking only to point out to you that it is very easy to tear apart a poorly written document (just as you insist on doing with FCM). There is no malice and no derogatory narrative in this post. There are many more errors to which I could have applied negative innuendo (one of your tactics) or rewritten for you (another of your tactics - and a particularly annoying one, I might add). I choose not to, not wishing to offend you. By the way, I very much doubt that I am your friend. Why do you address me as such? Surely you don't talk to your friends in the manner that you talk to me! S&P