Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Kosovo -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neocon who wrote (12885)	6/25/1999 10:48:00 AM
From: lin huan chen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 17770

On the other hand, it is hard to see why they would have purposely bombed the Embassy, even to disrupt intelligence gathering. It is very confusing... According to the new conspiracy theory, CIA believes Chinese Embassy has something to do with the shot-down of F-117 a few days before the bombing. FWIW regards

To: Neocon who wrote (12885)	6/25/1999 10:51:00 AM
From: John Lacelle	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 17770

Neocon, Here is my take on the Chinese take-out. I think some analyst was looking over maps of possible targets and discovered that the Chinese embassy now occupied a former Yugoslavian goverment building. He thought to himself "hmmm...I could sure have a good laugh if I toss the Chinese Embassy onto the target list". Most of these guys in the CIA and Military hate Bill Clinton. After all, he was the very thing they hated about the groovin 60's: the pot-smokin, draft-dodgin guys who would seduce your wife while you were in the jungle fighting commies. Of course, right after it happened, Clinton said something about how "somebody was going to get fired over this"...later they hastily said "reassigned". Now the CIA has a good cover story to cover the ass of some guy who has had enough with the President who has done more damage to national security than the Rosenburgs. -John

To: Neocon who wrote (12885)	6/25/1999 11:04:00 AM
From: George Papadopoulos	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 17770

> On the other hand, it is hard to see why they would have purposely bombed the Embassy, even to disrupt intelligence gathering. It is very confusing... They attacked the embassy to send a message to the Chinese.....I find that more plausible than wrong maps, etc...At the very least, the people responsible for this atrocity should have been held responsible. Have you heard of anyone losing his job over this? I don't think so...they keep trying to blame the CIA but they are not "going along"....something really smells about this.