Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: wiz who wrote (63247)	6/25/1999 10:39:00 AM
From: Skeeter Bug	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 132070

w/o the "e." just ad dq. ;-)

To: wiz who wrote (63247)	6/25/1999 10:58:00 AM
From: Knighty Tin	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 132070

Mark, I don't know on the spelling. I suggest you contact J. Danforth Quayle at Republicansandotherdummies.Com. <g> It looks like the retards have already run out of gas on MU. Though it is possible to run an overpriced stock where the fundamentals are horrible, and I participated once in doing so with Resorts International, it is not the way to bet the majority of the time. MU always seems to give bears another chance, but I would contend that 39 and change is awfully pricey and buy puts here and now. Hold some cash in case of a dead cat bounce, but I would not want to be without a one third position.