Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : FRANKLIN TELECOM (FCM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Noneyet who wrote (1003)	6/25/1999 2:28:00 PM
From: Seth L.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2891

NO THOMAS you are wrong! this exchange was about a challenge which you responded to. The challenge was list all the facts in 1 post that you have uncovered in your DD that make you feel this stock is a negative investment. I feel I have been very polite in the face of your attempts to discredit me. I have already acknowledged once already that I was wrong in the past about my expectations here. Opinions from you or me is fine but facts are what the reader wants. From the facts Thomas they can than better understand your opinions. Now back to the subject at hand. These are the facts that you stated with my rewording (I believe I was tougher on the company in my words than you were in yours) 1)Fact is, as far as we know, JM BEST and USAT are FCMs only customers of substance? 2) The law suit against Mr. Mcgruder barring him to have interaction with any of FCM/FNET clients or customers or prospects is still unresolved as far as public knowledge is concerned. 3)the contact phone number of CYBERVOZ.COM is 266 miles from address of corporate HQ 4) Franklin made announcement in 1997 that major company was buying DVG. Intrine never made the deal and FCM was irresponsible in this release 5) Internet passport never proved out to be the addition that FCM and Frank thought it would be 6) cyclone, tornado and other products have been represented by the company in the past as being products that should bring in a lot of revenue. Fact is the revenues from these products were less than expected . 7) FTEL has had a tendency to change corporate focus up until 2 years ago when they put all on back burner to focus energy on TEMPEST For the record I will post positive facts over the weekend. Than the reader can compare one to the other. Sethy