Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Winspear Resources -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SwampDogg who wrote (21938)	6/25/1999 3:05:00 PM
From: teevee	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 26850

fuddle, ""What I am looking forward to is when Pit #3 comes in with great results and then the speculation begins as to what they will find when they go underground. """ If you review prior news releases carefully, you may have noted that pit#3 lies right on top of the reported 60 degree trend of thicker kimberlite....IF pit#3 results duplicate Pit#2 results, here is a speculation for you to consider: the trend of thicker kimberlite may also represent the axis of injection...suggesting that the thicker kimberlite has the higher grades....a hypothetical reason could be that diamonds having a high specific gravity lagged behind in the melt, where the more distal and thinner portions have a comparatively lower grade($US181.00 is still as good implied value per tonne), and the thicker portions have a higher grade.....now wouldn't that be a happy circumstance......if that is the case, I would assume that any underground bulk sampling would be from a decline driven right down the high grade, thick section of the dyke:-)) regards, teevee