SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : TLAB info? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: still learning who wrote (5775)6/25/1999 7:48:00 PM
From: Farfel  Respond to of 7342
 
"Still learning"---you are right; in that quote---unlike the following one which more clearly delineated the time frame in which I was interested, I did make that statement; and in fact, Cisco gained about 100% during that time period to Tellabs 92% during the last 12 month period, and it currently is in play.

My point was that Cisco "stalled" since it's earnings on or about 2 Feb 99---- it hit about 118---120 prior to that February report; and since then, it has only inched up to 122 1/2 "split adjusted". Meanwhile, Tellabs, which was much lower than Cisco ----in the high 70's, low 80's "split adjusted" has since February advanced to as high as 139 1/2 "split adjusted". Thus, I chose to focus on Tellabs while withdrawing from my Cisco positions.

Currently, Cisco seems to be "in play" in that its "up" action today in a stagnant to down market is starting to draw my attention once again. And I will reconsider taking another position in Cisco next week----the only thing I find about Cisco which disappoints me is that Cisco is extremely predicatable: it either "meets analysts expectations" or it beats them by 1 cent. There is usually not the "blowout" potential which Tellabs exhibites. And this is no slam on Cisco ( as I said, I have owned it before).

But it is better to think about such things over a "pint of Guinness".




To: still learning who wrote (5775)6/25/1999 8:39:00 PM
From: Brien Koehler  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 7342
 
We need two TLAB Strings: 1:TLAB-serious 2:TLAB-Jerry Springer