Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Don't Ask Rambi -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ilaine who wrote (29990)	6/25/1999 10:12:00 PM
From: jbe	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 71178

No offense taken, Blue, none whatsoever. I guess I was trying to explain the mindset, or the personality type, of the classic agnostic, of which I am a representative (and you are not). If "classic atheists" have "mystical experiences," or a "sudden revelations of a Divine presence," they are likely to dismiss them as short-circuits in their own nervous systems. "Classic agnostics" are likely to refuse to ascribe any broader significance to them, one way or the other, although they may speculate about them. "Classic believers" are most likely to take such experiences as sufficient proof of the existence of a God. We see more or less the same picture where specific beliefs are concerned. The "classic atheist" will dismiss any and all beliefs that cannot be proved logically or scientifically. The "classic agnostic" believes that anything is possible, although not necessarily probable. The "classic believer" is most likely to select a particular belief, possibly, but not necessarily, one that s/he finds personally congenial. (The truth is not always palatable,after all.) One more thing about the "classic agnostic." If s/he finds a congenial belief, s/he is unlikely to think it true simply because it is congenial. In fact, this particular s/he is more likely to think it untrue, precisely because it is congenial. Figure that one out! <g> Joan