Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Don't Ask Rambi -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: nihil who wrote (29996)	6/25/1999 9:15:00 PM
From: jpmac	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 71178

uhm, she said "watching" not "giving". Big difference. Though some find "watching" to be a lot of fun.

To: nihil who wrote (29996)	6/25/1999 9:19:00 PM
From: Ilaine	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 71178

I will take your word that you find giving someone else an orgasm as satisfying as, or more satisfying than, having one yourself. The point I was trying to make is that you must be "you" to experience pleasure, in your case, the pleasure of giving someone else pleasure. But it's still not an orgasm unless you have it yourself. I don't think there is anything wrong with being "selfish," in the sense of wanting what you want and what you need. I have noticed that the people who deny themselves the most here on earth, the penitents, believe that this increases their reward in the afterlife. They have the greatest stake in their reward being in the sweet by-and-by, because they gave up the pleasure in the here-and-now. And I think that's pretty much the way it goes, the people who tell you that you are selfish for wanting your reward here-and-now all expect that they will get theirs in the sweet hereafter.