Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Winspear Resources -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LaFayette555 who wrote (21971)	6/25/1999 9:57:00 PM
From: Frankly Speaking	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 26850

F.P. Has anyone heard how thick the intersections are on the north shore? TIA, F.S.

To: LaFayette555 who wrote (21971)	6/25/1999 10:05:00 PM
From: dgz	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 26850

That may be so and I respect that, but they prefaced their comments by saying this is not like a Gold deposit in that it would have sporadic emplacements or veins, but rather that it was consistent. I may have read too much in to what was said, but I figured consistent meant not only that it would have diamonds throughout but that the diamond emplacement would have relatively similar grades to within plus or minus a reasonable percentage (20% perhaps ?). What we have here is a large variance (1.47 vs .84) which is a very large percentage. Knowing that, they should have been a little more careful in the words they chose to describe the deposit IMHO - BWTHDIK. That being said, I am in agreement with Red and am quite happy with the direction we're going.