info specific to rambus in bold near the end.
Date: 06/26 00:03 EST
Pact signals new game in DRAM
Jun. 25, 1999 (Electronic Engineering Times - CMP via COMTEX) -- Tokyo - The restructuring of Japan's semiconductor industry took a huge step forward last week, as the newly appointed chiefs of NEC Electronics and Hitachi Ltd. struck a surprise alliance merging their core DRAM businesses. Analysts praised the move as a dramatic and necessary gambit to create a new No. 3 player in the face of a consolidating memory industry. The upshot, though, may be to put further pressure on second-tier DRAM makers such as Mitsubishi, Toshiba and Fujitsu.
Faced with corporate restructuring, strong global rivals, weak sales and daunting development hurdles, NEC and Hitachi said they were impelled by a sense of urgency to join fortunes after first sitting down for talks in April. "It was a quick decision never made before between Japanese companies like ours," said Koji Nishigaki, president of NEC. "Such speed is essential for world competition," said Etsuhiko Shoyama, president of Hitachi.
Some analysts here speculated last week that the powerful Ministry of Trade and Industry had a hand in the deal. A MITI official declined to confirm the reports, but called the move "advisable and necessary."
The alliance, the two companies expect, will speed technology development, improve cost competitiveness by combining production resources and secure the minimum production scale needed to make a profit. "It is essential to increase cost competence by enlarging scale, " said NEC's Nishigaki.
Together, the partners are aiming for a combined worldwide DRAM market share of 20 percent. Today, NEC has about 11 percent and Hitachi about 6. Mario Morales, director of semiconductor research for International Data Corp. (Mountain View, Calif.), ranks the NEC/Hitachi combo as No. 3 in the market, behind Samsung and LG/Hyundai.
That could spell trouble for smaller players. Second-tier suppliers with less than 5 percent market share-including Toshiba, Mitsubishi and Fujitsu-will be under the gun to cut costs or grow their business if they are to survive, said memory analyst Steven Przybylski of the Verdande Group (San Jose, Calif.).
While hailing the alliance, Satoru Oyama, a senior analyst at ABN Amro Securities (Japan) Ltd., cautioned that both companies are wet behind the ears when it comes to strategic partnerships. Hitachi has had its share of failed alliances-notably a DRAM deal with Texas Instruments Inc. that was scotched when TI sold its memory operation to Micron Technology Inc. NEC has shied away from formal tie-ups. "There is a doubt whether those who have had no experience of success in alliances can carry out this alliance successfully," Oyama said.
Though details of the operation are subject to further discussion, the two companies will soon begin collaborating on a 256-Mbit DRAM for the 0.15-micron process generation, which they expect will be ready by fall of 2000. The partners are also discussing ways to share capacity and sell jointly developed devices under the same brand name.
Both companies already have 256-Mbit designs, but executives expect no trouble merging them. "The device structures resemble each other, so we expect that [a technology merger] will be easy," Nishigaki said.
Hitachi's Shoyama stressed the need to continue DRAM development even in such a harsh pricing environment. "The importance of DRAMs will never diminish in the next century," he said. "But these days we are inferior in terms of price competition. This alliance is the victory equation in DRAM."
As the first step, NEC and Hitachi will establish a joint-venture company by year's end responsible for development and design. The pair expects to assign a combined total of 1,000 engineers to the new company, said Keiichi Shimakura, associate senior vice president of NEC.
The two companies together spent about $417 million on DRAM R&D in the last fiscal year. But NEC and Hitachi said their intention is not to reduce costs or lay off employees. Instead, they hope to slash development time, which they said is key to staying cost competitive.
"We want to double development speed by the combined budget," said Nishigaki. "We want to shorten the development period to 1.5 years and even one year to take the lead."
Hitachi and NEC reported large losses in semiconductors in the last fiscal year, ending March 31. "The largest risk factor is the price of DRAM," said Nishigaki. Shoyama admitted that much of Hitachi's overall operating loss last fiscal year came from semiconductor sales, with DRAMs alone accounting for about half of that.
Though erstwhile competitors, the two presidents are kindred spirits: Both were appointed at the end of the last fiscal year and have inherited the daunting task of turning around sprawling electronics operations that are wallowing in red ink. Both have promised repeatedly to take drastic action to pull their companies out of the morass. And both see DRAMs as a strategic product.
Neither company would comment on how the alliance came about, but some analysts suggested Hitachi-which arguably has the most to gain-approached NEC. "Hitachi proposed [the deal to] NEC but NEC was reluctant," said ABN Amro analyst Oyama. "But both recognized that [alone], their human and financial resources are not enough to be competitive in the world market, and Hitachi was able to persuade NEC."
Among Japanese companies, Hitachi has suffered the worst declines in DRAM sales percentage-wise. According to Dataquest Inc., revenue plummeted from $1.7 billion in 1997 to $903 million in 1998. NEC's DRAM revenue dropped from $2.5 billion to $1.6 billion during the same period, Dataquest said.
Thus, "The alliance will be especially positive for Hitachi," said analyst Oyama.
There may have been an additional goad behind the scenes. MITI has begun to take a more active role in prodding companies to abandon the idea they can invest in a business with little regard for profit. Sources said last week that MITI may have midwifed the deal between NEC and Hitachi.
A MITI official would not comment except to say the ministry has evaluated the alliance and endorses it. "We support the idea of 'selection and concentration,' a term often used by executives recently, " said Shinpei Ago, deputy director of MITI's Industrial Electronics Division. "After the bubble economy [in the late '80s], Japanese industries as a whole still had excessive facilities and equipment. We are going to help the industries slim down, removing the excess and concentrating resources to increase competitiveness."
Ago said MITI is preparing a bill to submit to the Japanese Diet this session that will encourage corporate restructuring by reducing taxes that accompany mergers and acquisitions, making it easier for companies to raise funds for reorganizations. "We are going to help industries so that they can proceed with reorganizations efficiently without causing a big pain on society," such as layoffs, Ago said.
Hitachi was involved in a DRAM alliance with Mitsubishi Electric and Texas Instruments for 1-Gbit DRAMs, but that pact was dissolved once Micron Technology (Boise, Idaho) bought TI's memory division last year. A separate deal with LG Electronics in South Korea has also fallen by the wayside since LG's recent acquisition by Hyundai.
Though it has worked with Lucent Technologies on process technology and has an informal rapport with Samsung on DRAM technology, NEC has until now lived by the mantra of self-sufficiency in semiconductors. A crack appeared in that foundation last year, when NEC sought help from dedicated foundries to alleviate a 0.25-micron capacity crunch. And with the appointment of Nishigaki, who came from NEC's computer division, the sense of provincialism went out the door.
"When he came in he said enough is enough," said an NEC spokesman. "He's trying to send a message throughout the company that it's time to change and nothing is untouchable."
Sherry Garber, memory analyst at Semico Research Corp. (Phoenix, Ariz.), called the alliance a "reactive measure." The delayed transition to Rambus memory has led to additional available capacity for synchronous DRAM, she said, paired with falling prices. The average price for the 64-Mbit DRAM chip, the most common part in the market, has nosedived from about $9.50 in March to about $4.50 today, Garber said. "This is a brutal market, and I have been saying for some time that we need to see less capacity."
However, Garber sees a potential capacity crunch on the horizon, resulting from lower investment levels over the past 18 months by most of the major players. A combined NEC-Hitachi venture could be in a good position to capitalize on that by the end of this year, she said.
Mergers and alliances have become commonplace in DRAMs. Besides the TI-Micron and Hyundai-LG Semicon deals, Toshiba Corp. and Fujitsu Ltd. allied on development of 1-Gbit DRAMs last December. And Mitsubishi and Matsushita last year agreed to co-develop 0.15- and 0.13-micron process technology, which will include embedded DRAM.
"When companies plunk down their billion dollars for a DRAM fab, they are not likely to walk away from that investment," said Mark Ellsberry, vice president of marketing for Hyundai Electronics America (San Jose). "The DRAM companies really want to find a way to be more efficient, and to stay in the game."
Japan's DRAM vendors have also started to outsource production. Just last week, Mitsubishi announced it would transfer 0.2- and 0.18-micron DRAM process technology to Vanguard International Semiconductor Corp., an affiliate of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. in which it holds a significant share.
IDC analyst Morales said the merger of the two Japanese and two Korean DRAM operations will probably not affect overall industry capacity until the middle of next year. Meanwhile, DRAM prices are expected to continue to fall, he said.
Morales said he expects most of the players will continue to split their bets across Rambus, 133-MHz SDRAM and double-data-rate parts. "Most companies will try to offer all the memory flavors," he said. -Additional reporting by Anthony Cataldo, Rick Merritt and Will Wade.
-0-
By: Yoshiko Hara Copyright 1999 CMP Media Inc. |