Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : The New Iomega '2000' Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: David Colvin who wrote (1105)	6/26/1999 7:57:00 PM
From: sheila rothstein	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 5023

Dave 125/25= 5; but 150/25=6. SR

To: David Colvin who wrote (1105)	6/28/1999 10:19:00 AM
From: D.J.Smyth	Respond to of 5023

David, the numbers I was looking at was reviewing the tie ratio of new drives sold vs the tie ratio of existing drives. dividing the entire number of drives sold by the total number of disks sold doesn't give a realistic picture (according to what i was reading) of expected number of disks to be sold with each new drive over a given time frame (i.e., within one year's time). you must configure a model to include the tie ratio of existing drives (over one year) and the ratio of new drives (those drives sold within a one year time frame) to get a realistic look at the expected revenue from the disks. i was giving examples, not necessarily the total sold.