Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Medinah Mining Inc. (MDHM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Coz who wrote (16191)	6/27/1999 9:39:00 AM
From: Gary Jacobs	Respond to of 25548

thanks coz. i'm going to persist with my broker. <eom>

To: Coz who wrote (16191)	6/28/1999 1:10:00 AM
From: Coz	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 25548

I've been talking with some people about what could really put the pressure on this short squeeze issue which has been so hotly debated here, and I suppose the surest way to put this issue to bed would be for everyone to call for BOTH their Medinah Gold AND MDHM share certificates. That would absolutely put an end to the whole discussion, and we'd all know the truth. I know that many people feel that their shares are more liquid if held in street name which really doesn't help MDHM with their strategy, but it occurs to me that if all the rumors of a JV come true, that may be the time to take the registration leap. If we get a JV, then we can all examine the terms and conditions, and if we're all happy with the agreement and wish to hold while phase 2 drilling occurs, wouldn't that be a perfect time to ask for your share certificates to be delivered for both Medinah Gold and MDHM? I mean, if there is a large short position, imagine the chaos of a huge announcement from MDHM followed by everyone who could, either asking for their shares to be placed in Local Safekeeping at their brokerage house or requesting that their certificates issued directly to them. Talk about a squeeze...... If your shares are in a retirement account, they are already protected from legal shorts; so, you wouldn't need to do this. Everyone else could make a real difference though. And this way, there would be no more debate. One side or the other is right on this issue. This is something we can do to prove just who's right. A couple of days ago, I posted a form that was sent to me to request safekeeping or delivery. I'll post it again below in case anyone likes this idea. --Coz ============================================ Date:__________________ To:____________________(broker) at ___________________(firm) Could you please have all of the shares of both Medinah Mining and Medinah Gold that I have in my account at your firm registered in my name and either kept in your safekeeping "segregated" account or mailed to my address if your firm doesn't have a safekeeping account. I definitely need the certificates in my name, however, I will provide you with the necessary power of attorney when I whish to sell. The CUSIP number of Medinah Mining (OTC:BB-MDHM) is 584894109. The transfer agent of Medinah Mining is: American Registrar and transfer Co. 705-10 Exchange Place P.O. Box 1798 Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 Phone: (801) 363-9065 Fax: (801) 363-9066 Signature:__________________________ Print name:_________________________ Account number:____________________ Address: _______________________ _______________________ _______________________