Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : FRANKLIN TELECOM (FCM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: rd greer who wrote (1088)	6/27/1999 2:45:00 PM
From: Brett S.	Respond to of 2891

rd, This is why I changed my mind, at least in part because he has not called the company or reviewed many of the questions as to there impact on future earnings (yet).. No disrespect intended. This was part of the PMs we exchanged as I wanted to calm myself because of what was or was not happening. I offered to conference call WLV so he and I could speak directly with the company to ask his question there.... The conference call did not take place. I offered but I did not push the issue. However, I did communicate with IR myself. I have found that companies will call back the investor who calls directly but normally will not call others based on a third party request. As a result, what is said here no longer has much merit and I feel 1000% better about my investment. No name calling here.... No disrespect intended. I am sure he found another source for info which he bases his thoughts on and I am glad for all the research as I have learned a lot of good information which makes me want to buy even more FCM. And please... I don't want to exchange flames on this, I MEAN NO DISRESPECT!

To: rd greer who wrote (1088)	6/27/1999 4:18:00 PM
From: Noneyet	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2891

RD, You wrote in three separate posts what I assume to mean that I did not answer seth. I don't know what board you are looking at, but I'll reference my earlier response to seth, which by the way, is not finished. exchange2000.com I only responded up to his item # 7. I could also answer marks, but have refrained up to this point because at least his post was relatively civil. So if you insist I shall continue. PS. To BrettS, I did offer to call you and you declined that offer. Is that not correct ?

To: rd greer who wrote (1088)	6/27/1999 4:26:00 PM
From: mark garner	Respond to of 2891

i would like to see this board return to a certain level of civility. if we can continue to provide facts to backup any bullish arguement i am quite certain that all bearish arguements can be proven to be relatively inconsequential. in my opinion we have to look at this company in an entirely different light starting from one year ago when Peter Buswell took over. i am pretty confident that the positives of this investment vastly outweigh the negatives in this timeframe. although hard at times, lets try to keep the personal aspect out of the discussions if possible. i would really prefer to be doing something else than sitting in front of this computer answering questions.