Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neocon who wrote (54433)	6/28/1999 8:39:00 AM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

Dan got the boot because he did not accept his suspension and he tried an end run around it. The Empress of California and leader of the panty throwing fringe seems to forget there were other conservatives suspended from the thread as there were other liberals suspended from the thread, including the granddaddy of them all, Les X and the divine Ms. M herself. I never did turn Harris in for her cockamamie views including several off topic personal attacks on such subjects as my profession, the state I live in, my wife, etc. It is my understanding from SI admin at least based upon the information I could garner that any of these would constitute grounds for suspension as off topic personal attacks. I'm just guessing here as SI admin is rather tightlipped as to guidance in these areas but applying the precedent of my own suspension and making a reasonable analogy, I'd say my suppositions are about right. I no longer believe that we should refrain from reporting those with whom we disagree. I figure what's good for the goose is good for the gander, or in this case, the daffy duck. JLA

To: Neocon who wrote (54433)	6/28/1999 11:33:00 AM
From: Lizzie Tudor	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 67261

My point is, if you use my name, I would appreciate a little more forthrightness in terms of details. To imply I was the only one to engage in getting SI involved is really a misrepresentation ... you can't even call it a stretch, since Bill (and yourself) were instrumental in removing Dan, I myself was suspended for a time, etc. and finally, after repeated threats from JLA he was suspended. JLA is the mirror image of Dan, since tons of JLAs posts were removed whereas Dan's never were, he was suspended for longer than the usual few days which is all Dan got... Dan screwed himself by logging in under gnet which as I say I believe he thought was just a loophole... but no matter that was it for him. This insistance from you all that Dan is somehow the worst poster here is really funny - lol.