Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Eric Wells who wrote (65002)	6/28/1999 4:52:00 AM
From: dbblg	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 164684

Hi Eric, Interesting series of posts; this thread needs more bears. Amazon's style, however, seems to be to say "trust us - profits aren't important now - we will eventually prove ourselves and become profitable." They've been saying this for five years. I don't believe that such an approach is prudent, nor is it indicative of a CEO who feels a strong responsibility to his shareholders. IMO, comparing Amazon to a software company doesn't get you very far. From pre-ipo, it has been positioned as an infrastructure play, so more useful points of reference might be MCI in the early 80s or MFS more recently. (Amazon is, of course, richly valued even in these terms; I am long-term bullish, obv., , but am well aware that the 5-year chart may end up looking like ASND's. ) So far, Bezos has been able to raise the money he feels he needs without mentioning profits. As long as this is the case, managing for profits only spurs offline competitors to jump in faster/bigger with their online offerings and makes it easier for new entrants to raise capital. The failure to keep the stock price above the conversion price should, imo, be weighed against this. If market conditions change dramatically over the next two-three years, I suspect Amazon will change its tune. Again, the changes infrastructure companies made to their business plans in order to appease their bankers during the early 1990s would probably be the closest parallel, though I honestly don't see the story unfolding that way.