Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : FRANKLIN TELECOM (FCM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Seth L. who wrote (1100)	6/28/1999 10:47:00 AM
From: semi-recumbent	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2891

Seth, maybe Thomas is conflicted by this ongoing debate. He might be long FCM and getting longer as the price stays low. He has admitted, after all, that on AT LEAST one occasion he has posted negatively on a stock that he owned. If you forgot about that check post #1000 on this very thread. : "To: +mark garner (997 ) From: +Thomas DeSousa Friday, Jun 25 1999 1:10PM ET Reply # of 1103 Mark, you silly man, there is only one problem with that, you forgot to mention I was long Amati. I was a big detractor towards that stock while I held a long position. ..."

To: Seth L. who wrote (1100)	6/28/1999 1:39:00 PM
From: Noneyet	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2891

Seth, I've been busy, I must apologize, that I could not answer sooner. I guess you weren't paying attention to what I said in the post that you responded to. However since you insist, I will prepare my response to items # 8-26 as time allows. Be advised this response may consist of more than one page. My question is, will that be allowable ? I realize the rules "you" have set forth for "me" are very strict. My last sentence below. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> All that said, I have deferred completing my response to your original post of item #s 8 – 26 for the moment. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Your "assumption" was and is incorrect. I did not respond because of the nature of the civil posts recently. PERIOD >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thomas either post the negative FACTS that you have uncovered or I will assume that you have none and your are spinning to save face. <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< Also, I did not buy today, so you can rule me out for the price increase, and volume. Perhaps it was my comments about Vodavi that helped ??? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd like to know more about that Vodavi deal. This looks like a real good company. They have good financing, some real honest content in their filings etc. etc. <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<