SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: The Philosopher who wrote (42424)6/28/1999 1:41:00 PM
From: E  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 108807
 
Yes, the circumstances one would have to postulate would be unusual ones, for sure. And of course a law against rape will impact male rapists disparately, there being so many more of them. There have been a few statutory rape cases against females recently. Though I suspect that with statutory rape, there is a gender disparity caused only partly by the larger number of male statutory rapists. Partly responsible also, I suspect, would be the existence of a double standard in which male victims of statutory rape are more likely to be congratulated than commiserated. Most parents of sons would find the double standard unfair, and certainly would if the rape resulted in their young son's contracting a disease or becoming a father.



To: The Philosopher who wrote (42424)6/28/1999 8:03:00 PM
From: Father Terrence  Respond to of 108807
 
Here's another possibility.:

A wife drugs her husband, attaches a huge plastic dildo around her waist and f---- his rectum raw until he is bleeding and has internal injuries. He awakes from his stupor and must be rushed to a hospital.

Will she be charged with rape if she claims she did it while sleepwalking?

FT


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News