Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: John Curtis who wrote (12424)	6/28/1999 11:50:00 AM
From: MGV	Respond to of 27311

Well past time to move on people. The lack of excitement by the longs is palpable.

To: John Curtis who wrote (12424)	6/28/1999 12:04:00 PM
From: geep	Respond to of 27311

John, Could you or someone else who listened to cc please do a quick summary. My internet hookup kicked out several times . What I did hear was a confident group,. Specifically, what was Lev talking about when he mentioned an announcement (?) possibly within a month? And what was his response to the lawsuit question? I kicked out when he said it is under appeal. Thank you.

To: John Curtis who wrote (12424)	6/28/1999 12:11:00 PM
From: mooter775	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27311

John, Conference call was fine and about what I expected. Think someone will probably post entire call, so I'll wait for any detailed comments. If not, I'll post my notes later. Still long and very comfortable.

To: John Curtis who wrote (12424)	6/28/1999 12:46:00 PM
From: atticus4paws	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 27311

All, I just wanted to mention a few interesting things Lev mentioned in the call. 1. Orders from both Hanil and Alliant surprised Lev in size. The comment seemed to be spontaneous enough to indicate it's genuine. 2. Lev alluded to business practice in S.Korea as being favorable to Hanil getting deals with customers quickly. 3. Lev said Alliant is actively pursuing retrofiting existing military battery solutions with Valence's li-poly. 4. Energizer situation was disappointing, but currently working itself out with customers. 5. Valence is pursuing its owned branded batteries. Something I hadn't heard mentioned before. 6. New financing to be announced (likely) within a month. 7. Amount of announce contracts being witheld for competitive reasons. I guess competitors could estimate battery pricing based on material and cost. 8. Valence is struggling to meet demand from Alliant right now. I think that's what I heard. Anyone else hear that?? These are just a few things that were discussed. I get the impression that operations are on track. Apologies if someone has already posted this info. Chris