Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Silver prices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Stephen O who wrote (1938)	6/28/1999 1:47:00 PM
From: Alan Whirlwind	Respond to of 8010

It is a viable mine property that when push came to shove, wasn't worth enough to save RO. Devaluation may have been a better term than destruction, as I'm sure it would be worth a pile given a $100 an oz rise in gold. And I was referring to the Kemess project and not Kinross, an entirely different mining play. Sorry for the error. --Alan

To: Stephen O who wrote (1938)	6/28/1999 2:20:00 PM
From: marcos	Respond to of 8010

Kinross is leveraged more than some others, and wouldn't do so well in an extended period of low PoG ... it's also more of a silver producer than is commonly known, 17% exposure to the PoS if memory serves .. if not, it's higher .... i think k is bottoming, but then i thought that when i bought at 2.55 too ... also when i bought a few at ~5 in the rrsp well over a year ago -g- It's no Royal Oak, though ... nor a Barrick with a lid on it. Good trading vehicle, imho. quote.yahoo.com - caught up with xau after slow start quote.yahoo.com