SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Paul Engel who wrote (63591)6/28/1999 3:04:00 PM
From: Kevin K. Spurway  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1571926
 
AMD heads ought to roll. Jerry needs to step aside.

However, unlike AMD, with a monopoly position in the industry and overwhelming development resources, Intel has no excuse.

Kevin



To: Paul Engel who wrote (63591)6/28/1999 3:09:00 PM
From: Kevin K. Spurway  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1571926
 
Re: "Intel delayed MERCED by 6 months."

Merced is ALREADY delayed by 6 months. It was originally supposed to ship towards the end of 1998. And if you seriously think that Merced will ship (in commercial quantities) before the end of this year (before CuLaterMine, no less!) you must be smoking some serious wacky weed.

Kevin


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News