Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Bill Wexler's Dog Pound -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: CMason who wrote (1594)	6/28/1999 4:33:00 PM
From: ynot	Respond to of 10293

could be worse i guess, at least he acknowleged that there might be trouble if sales slow down, and cash was tight...better than getting a bunch of old PR's and rumours like IDTC... ynot :)

To: CMason who wrote (1594)	6/28/1999 4:52:00 PM
From: David	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 10293

Conversely, it must be a bullish sign when clueless shorts start trashing a company they obviously haven't studied. I'll be happy to debate the merits of this company after you have spent a little time learning about the company and its markets. Until then, I'll take your interest as a bullish sign.

To: CMason who wrote (1594)	6/28/1999 5:00:00 PM
From: lindend	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10293

Just to add a little fuel to the fire, before this recent crusade against Bill, David only posted to the Identix thread (with one exception). It does not appear as if Bill broadcast his sell/short sell warning to multiple threads, so the question is, how did David find out? I can think of only two options: 1.PM from Bill or another SI member. 2 Daily searches through SI hoping to crush any short fire that might explode. These characteristics are not proof of a shill, but it is highly suspicious. David, could you clarify why we shouldn't believe you are a stock promoter or a shill?