Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sam Ferguson who wrote (42487)	6/28/1999 6:55:00 PM
From: greenspirit	Respond to of 108807

hmmmm, so would you agree with the premise that women have the right also to maim or disfigure the fetus and allow it to be born?

To: Sam Ferguson who wrote (42487)	6/28/1999 7:12:00 PM
From: epicure	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 108807

I cannot agree with you. Although I have a problem with abortion- I have much less of a problem with killing a small bundle of cells, or even a tiny fetus in the first 3 months- than I do killing a fetus after the first 3 months. There is no way to draw a clear moral distinction- but as in so many other things, rational people of goodwill will find the compassionate moral middle ground between allowing all abortions up until the time of delivery and eliminating the availability of abortions completely. That first breath thing just doesn't work for me.