SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Waiting for the big Kahuna -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Haim R. Branisteanu who wrote (41124)6/28/1999 8:31:00 PM
From: pater tenebrarum  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 94695
 
Haim, i just looked at the CBOE put/call statistics myself...complacency reigns supreme in this market. i have closed out several long positions myself today, as i have come to doubt the 'melt-up' scenario more and more. as i have pointed out in my last p/c update on the MDA web site, the general assumption that the rate hike will 'clear the air' is a fallacy. if the bias remains as it is(which seems very likely) the uncertainties plaguing the market now will remain in place. i remember a rally following a rate hike in the early nineties, as the Fed was perceived to be on top of inflation. since right now there seems to be no inflation, the market will ask: why is the Fed hiking rates? answer: to bring the stock market down, even if they don't say so. AG can not spot the bubble, but he can spot inflation down the road? whoever wants to believe it and die happy, be my guest. investors would do well to remember the part of AG's speech where he stated that a crash would not necessarily bring the economy to it's knees...never mind that he is likely wrong about that (what else would bring the economy down?), this is what he believes.
the collapse in the savings rate that you point out, coupled with record public participation in the stock market is a recipe for doom. at the moment, people are prepared to take on risk; what if that changes? the consumer spending boom would be over, it could in fact disappear overnight if the market crashes.
people comfort themselves with the notion that AG doesn't want a crash, and therefore, so the reasoning goes, it can not happen. really? just imagine all those online traders hitting the 'sell' button at the same time...
AG says a bubble can only be identified in retrospect, as one can not assume that 'hundreds of thousands of informed investors have it wrong'. really? if one considers all the hallmarks of a bubble, then why can it not be identified right away? if all those informed investors can not get it completely wrong how come there have been bubbles in the past?
anyhow, we all know this market goes only up, so what am i ranting for...<g>

regards,

hb