Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (54558)	6/28/1999 10:32:00 PM
From: Tom Clarke	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

I have a lot of respect for working women. My wife makes more money than I do and that paycheck has been very good to us. I just think the right to live supercedes the right to be inconvenienced. Do you really think companies owned by women would suffer if Roe was overturned? I'd like to think those companies are more solid than that. Riots on the west coast if Roe is overturned? Now we have two reasons to root for that happening. I'm trying to visualize what that would look like. Let's see, bra burning has already been done. Would it resemble a panty raid of some sort? I'll have to drive to the west coast and check it out when they start. Alas, I don't know any female millionaires.

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (54558)	6/29/1999 12:43:00 AM
From: truedog	Respond to of 67261

to: Michelle Harris from: truedog Re: turmoil Now the truth comes from your pc!!!! Money is the important issue with you. More important than human life. You have just said so yourself. Women have all the control over their bodies that they need. If they don't want to get pregnant, either use protection or see that your partner does before you go screwing around. Frankly, I don't give a damn what any millionaire female has to say. To love money more than life is, to say the least, barbaric. truedog ps; They might as well have a riot on the west coast. The African Americans have been having them for decades. If one does start, I hope all of LA and surrounding dens of iniquity are burned out of existence. t

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (54558)	6/29/1999 8:06:00 AM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

Michelle, unlike yourself most women millionaires are intelligent enough not to get themselves "in a family way" to begin with. I doubt the results of your suggested poll would advance your cause. JLA

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (54558)	6/29/1999 10:37:00 AM
From: Johannes Pilch	Respond to of 67261

>Here you are on a technical investment thread and yet you don't respect working women enough to give them control over their own bodies. Well that is just great.< I do not know about Charles, but I simply have more respect for an innocent child than for a womyn that would support killing one to maintain her friggin' career.(Eew yuck!) Surely pregnancy under certain circumstances puts some women under severe duress. Nevertheless in only a few circumstances can I see where killing a child is possibly warranted. If the “working woman” is so dang smart, she would avoid getting herself knocked up in the first place. Once she finds herself with child, she has dang sho made a decision to bring it into the world. She simply has no choice on this point. Her choice lies in the realm of life and death. She may choose to bring her child in the world alive, or she may choose to murder it. Some choice. >To hell with ebay and Marimba, huh?< If a company exists such that it cannot continue in the event its chief encounters difficulty, then that is life. If the chief did not have the brains to establish plans in the event of such contingencies, then yes - to hell with both the chief and the company. Neither deserved to exist in the first place. >I can assure you riots will ensue on the west coast if roe v wade is overturned. Women out here have too much power for that.< Right Michelle. You are full of wish. If when Roe falls the West Coast suddenly fills up with a bunch of tongue wagging female millionaires, I for one will personally fly out to laugh at them. >Just do a routine inquiry of every female millionaire you know, and tabulate their responses.< Well I suspect I know at least a few female millionaires, and I can tell you that while some of them would perhaps not agree with reversing Roe (and others I am certain would agree Roe is a bunch of legal garbage), none of them would riot in the event Roe is overturned. It simply is not their style. I suspect, Michelle, that when Roe is overturned the streets will contain hardly one female millionaire, except for those whose pockets have been filled with the blood of countless children. But they do not count. Millionaires will not be in the streets. But folk like you will be, and this will be enough to keep me home. Ain't got the stomach for hairy legged wymyn and their dang hairy armpits. But dang! I would just LOVE to see a bunch of female millionaires rioting in the streets. Oh my, what a spectacle that would be.