SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : SPIN-OFFS "secret hiding places of stock market profits" -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Stewart Whitman who wrote (322)6/29/1999 10:29:00 AM
From: marketmover  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1185
 
Stewart -- Thanks for pointing out ESSF

Read the S-4/A. The spinoff is worth a minimum of $1.50 ($6) and potentially a lot more. They were barely profitable in 1998 (eps of 0.55 pro forma, 1.5% net margin). I have a call in to them to see what 1999 will look like. 1stQ 1999 revenues were up 26% with growth by acquisitions. Could be a nice roll-up story in a hot housing market!



To: Stewart Whitman who wrote (322)6/29/1999 1:52:00 PM
From: Bob Rudd  Respond to of 1185
 
Stewart: I used RAL as an example [A friend had brought it up] to clarify my understanding of the general tendency of the base biz rising and the spinoff falling and then rising after a spin.
JCP presents me with what psychologists call an approach-avoidance conflict. With a price/sales of .3 extracting Eckard, JCP looks good relative to group PS 1.2 and is positioned between Sears @ .43 and K Mart @ .25 [But Kmarts exposure of Builder square leases makes it no deal] Net, it's moderately attractive from valuation perspective at first glance. The avoidance aspect is that non-focused middle ground retailers like Sears and JCP are losing ground to discounters like Walmart as well as Kohls, Target and high-enders like Macy's.
cbs.marketwatch.com
Internet retailing is also causing many investors in retail to discount the shares of all but the strongest performers.

Appreciate your comments and I'll take a close look at JCP, but at the moment remain conflicted.

Be well,
bob