SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Bill Wexler's Dog Pound -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: lindend who wrote (1626)6/28/1999 11:36:00 PM
From: David  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10293
 
Thanks for the recap. Although I would call a positive poster to a single thread a "long" rather than a "tout," I understand your perspective.

However, you are going to have to rely on someone other than me to carry out step 3, since the only posts I am going to make are going to be in response to posts to me (actually, that's already the dynamic) and I am going to insist on seeing some substance to them in order to respond. That starts right now. I'm not big on name calling. And for all I know, IDX could drop in the next month or two instead of go up . . . my time horizon is well, well beyond that. As for my onslaught, I think we can categorize only two or three as other than a response. The onslaught seemed to be coming from the shorts here.

Anyway, I don't mind seeing substantive posts on IDX, and I don't care, either, if this subject is gone tomorrow.



To: lindend who wrote (1626)6/29/1999 10:38:00 AM
From: Bob Trocchi  Respond to of 10293
 
Linden...

>>I'd wager to say most readers of the thread weren't too interested in IDX before your unbelievable onslaught of posts. The more you post, the more shorts it attracts...sort of like sharks sensing blood in the water.<<

Maybe David is actually a closet short!! I have no position but the more David posts, the more interested I become.

Bob T.