Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Market Gems:Stocks w/Strong Earnings and High Tech. Rank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Erick444 who wrote (46908)	6/28/1999 11:59:00 PM
From: Jenna	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 120523

CUST holds interest to us only insofar as there is money to be made from the stock. There are enough stocks, shorts longs for everyone to go around. I also am not in CUST but whether I decide to take good money and enter that company it would have to be a heck of a lot more incentive than animosity. If I recall my trading ABC's, "animosity" was on the 'other' list.. The one that makes good traders go bad. 209.238.58.46 We have never, ever had bickering on this thread and we pride ourself in our good humor, interaction, good trading acumen from all the regulars (and even not so regulars) The interactivity, cameraderie on this thread leads us to good trades like WITC, JWEB, BRCM,BEBE,FDX, and yes even CUST etc. I wouldn't mind a gap up or gap down since I'll be ready for either. I just anticipate a gap up and right before it weakens, if it does, I will also go short or get puts.

To: Erick444 who wrote (46908)	6/29/1999 2:32:00 AM
From: SMALL FRY	Respond to of 120523

Erick... I have no position in CUST so you can say I'm neutral until the wind starts blowing after the bell in the AM. I have no animosity towards A@P or any other shorts, although the negativity can be tiresome. The half truths, the distortions and the bullying posts can only alienate traders... bear in mind the shorts don't have a monopoly on logical thought processes, and information are widespread in the Web... if one is so sure about one's position, one must sit back and wait to reap his just rewards. We too can read and some of us may even have some kind of education and what passes for intelligence... thus we tend to trust our own decisions and not stampeded by amateurish mass psychologists. Regards, SF

To: Erick444 who wrote (46908)	6/29/1999 6:05:00 AM
From: lee kramer	Respond to of 120523

ERICK 444: We have anamometers, we have anal-retentives, we have antiquated analysts, we have anxious moments, we have a few antics even...but we have no animosity. What we do have, and it to seems to be an immediate "collective-consciousness" group response, is an instant antipathy, distrust, when presented with a post, any post, that simply does not have the "ring" of truth attached. We, me, some...may disagree with any poster's analysis or point of view if presented in a benign, reasoned, well-thought-out manner. But vitriolic attacks to shove a point of view down rapidly constricting throats are, quite simply, unprofessional, childish even. No, it's not animosity; it's just a bit annoying, finally tiresome and of no value to 'Gemmers. Your post, by the way, is coherent, readable, with of nice touch of humor and satire, and of value. Hope to read more from you. (Lee)