SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: long-gone who wrote (36104)6/29/1999 9:38:00 AM
From: Hawkmoon  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 116856
 
Richard,

Why do you continue to twist my words?

I was referring to currencies, not commodities.

And no I normally don't believe in extensive subsidization programs for commodities.

I don't agree with PIK (payment in kind) farm related susidies aimed at removing land from production, since for one.. it does not prevent the farmer from renting out his land to another farmer (at least it didn't used to). The idea was to prop up agricultural prices, as well as resusitating the land by letting it sit fallow for a year.

My experience, having grown in an agricultural community of 8,000 people is this program just didn't work as there were too many loopholes and too little enforcement.

The same goes for milk price supports. This has created an dairy industry where multi-thousand head dairies pump out milk FAR beyond demand, fulling knowing that gov't programs will buy up their excess and convert it to cheese or dry milk.

Quit looking for the agenda Richard, and spend more time reading what I'm actually saying.

Your support of the gold industry, producing a commodity far in excess of industrial demand, is subsidization.... clear and simple.

That makes those who propose re-inventing a role for gold as a currency in order to prop up its commodity status no better than many of these other pork barrel special interest groups trying to live off the gov't teat.

Regards,

Ron