SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Manhattan Minerals (MAN.T) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Claude Cormier who wrote (2648)6/29/1999 12:58:00 PM
From: mineman  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 4504
 
The 11 m (36 ft) thick gold-enhanced oxide-layer 15 m (50 ft) deep is completely uneconomic because:

(1) The grades and thicknesses are erratic. From the northwest end of the 300 m (1,000 ft) wide gossan zone over the 500 m (1,600 ft) length to the southeast end the grades vary from .015 ot .24 oz/t and from 4 to 18 m thick. (complete assay results below)

(2) The highest grades (holes 6 to 21 above) are in the north-west 1/2 of the zone under the town of Tambo-Grande (population 10,000) and it would cost at least 5 million to re-settle the 5,000 people (5,000 X $10,000/each = $5 million).

(3) Because the thickness varies from 4 to 18 m (13 to 58 ft) it would be very difficult to blast and remove the gold layer without including a lot of unmineralized rock which would considerably lower the grade.

(4) The strip-ratio would be 1.5:1 to 4:1 which is very high for a bulk-tonnage gold operation.

(5) Without moving 5,000 people the total reserves = 200,000 ozs of gold (value = $50 mil). If the town were moved only 500,000 ounces of gold (value = $125 mil) could be extracted.

(6) The gold is restricted to the gossan area above the massive sulphides. (Manhattan's current drilling is outside this zone)

With gold at $260/oz the gold reserves are too small and low grade to be economic and the overlying town is just an added factor that ensures the project is completely uneconomic.

**Assay results from north-west to south-east along the 500 m (1,600 ft) long zone:

Hole 6 = .15 oz/t gold, 2 oz/t silver / 17 m (55 ft)
Hole 1 = .15, 1.5 / 18 m (58 ft)
Hole 4 = .2, 3 / 4 m (13 ft)
Hole 3 = .15, 6 / 9 m (29 ft)
Hole 17 = .2, .6 / 4 m (13 ft)
Hole 18 = .08, 4 / 15 m (50 ft)
Hole 19 = .1, 1 / 11 m (36 ft)
Hole 7 = .02, .9 / 14 m (46 ft)
Hole 16 = .6, 2.5 / 5 m (16 ft)
Hole 9 = .24, .9 / 8 m (26 ft)
Hole 21 = .15, 5 / 14 m (46 ft)
Hole 20 = .18, 1 / 10 m (32 ft)
Hole 10 = .015, .3 / 16 m (52 ft)
Hole 13 = .1, .25 / 9 m (29 ft)
Hole 11 = .2, 16 / 14 m (46 ft)
Hole 12 = .2, 1 / 5 m (16 ft)



To: Claude Cormier who wrote (2648)6/29/1999 7:44:00 PM
From: Elizabeth Andrews  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 4504
 
This is just a further reminder to steer clear of incompetent management groups. I mean if it is acknowledged that VMS deposits are polymetallic why not assay for gold as a routine procedure?